Tuesday , November 24 2020
Home / Amol Agrawal: Mostly Economics / Corporate irresponsibility in the shipping industry: A dark side of global trade

Corporate irresponsibility in the shipping industry: A dark side of global trade

Summary:
Prof Guillaume Vuillemey  of HEC Paris in this voxeu piece writes on the dark side of shipping industry: The maritime shipping industry has been the backbone of globalisation, carrying 80% to 90% of global trade flows. This column shows that over the past four decades, shipping firms are being systematically structured to evade corporate responsibilities. Potential tort liabilities, for example in case of an oil spill, are evaded by registering each ship in a different subsidiary; regulatory standards are evaded by using flags of convenience; and long-term responsibilities related to ship recycling are evaded using so-called last-voyage flags. … These findings highlight a downside of globalisation: the drop in transportation costs over the past decades was partly achieved via the

Topics:
Amol Agrawal considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Amol Agrawal writes When the Bank of England rescued Midland Bank in early 1990s

Amol Agrawal writes The impact of the pandemic on cultural capital in the finance industry

Amol Agrawal writes The second wave of central bank policy innovation

Amol Agrawal writes Kenya’s digital transformation journey

Prof Guillaume Vuillemey  of HEC Paris in this voxeu piece writes on the dark side of shipping industry:
Hmm..
I sent this article to a friend in shipping industry. His comment:
Well there is truth in that, but that assessment is without context. If an upright shipping company, wants to take on all the responsibility then it will not be able to compete, as freight is highly commoditized. Will any company pay more on sea freight if I told him I am higher on the corporate responsibility ?
So to make a level playing field, you need a rules based ‘global body’.
That is the IMO (International Maritime Organization), which sets rules for safety, environment, and labor reform.  One may argue that IMO is moving too slowly, and I would personally agree.
But again remember IMO is made up of member states, with the most powerful members being China, EU, Japan, and US.
So in the end, these member states need to move, to make shipping, or for that matter any industry/issue that has global (and not just sovereign) jurisdiction.
Amol Agrawal
I am currently pursuing my PhD in economics. I have work-ex of nearly 10 years with most of those years spent figuring economic research in Mumbai’s financial sector.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *