Wednesday , August 5 2020
Home / Amol Agrawal: Mostly Economics / Distribution of Public Spending on Health: The Case of Bihar and Tamil Nadu

Distribution of Public Spending on Health: The Case of Bihar and Tamil Nadu

Summary:
Mita Choudhury and Jay Dev Dubey in this NIPFP paper: Equitable distribution of public spending has been argued to be an effective tool for enhancing access to health care and moving towards Universal Health Coverage. In India, much of the existing evidence on equity in public spending has been confined to state-levelaggregates, and intra-state distribution of public spending has received limited attention. This paper focuses on the distribution of public spending on health within two Indian States (Bihar and Tamil Nadu) to provide insights on differential access to health care within eachstate. The analysis suggests that public spending on health is pro-rich in Bihar, and plays a relatively weak redistributive role. In contrast, the distribution of public spending on health in Tamil

Topics:
Amol Agrawal considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Amol Agrawal writes Will the newly created In­ternational Financial Ser­vi­ces Centres Authority be the new boss of India’s financial markets?

Amol Agrawal writes The IMF’s financial surveillance in Europe – experiences with FSAPs

Amol Agrawal writes The Macroeconomic Consequences of Infrastructure Investment

Amol Agrawal writes Why central banks need to think historically

Mita Choudhury and Jay Dev Dubey in this NIPFP paper:

Equitable distribution of public spending has been argued to be an effective tool for enhancing access to health care and moving towards Universal Health Coverage. In India, much of the existing evidence on equity in public spending has been confined to state-level
aggregates, and intra-state distribution of public spending has received limited attention. This paper focuses on the distribution of public spending on health within two Indian States (Bihar and Tamil Nadu) to provide insights on differential access to health care within each
state. The analysis suggests that public spending on health is pro-rich in Bihar, and plays a relatively weak redistributive role. In contrast, the distribution of public spending on health in Tamil Nadu is strikingly pro-poor, particularly at lower levels of care. In both horizontal
and vertical dimensions (across districts and levels of health care), inequity in public spending is significantly higher in Bihar than in Tamil Nadu.

Amol Agrawal
I am currently pursuing my PhD in economics. I have work-ex of nearly 10 years with most of those years spent figuring economic research in Mumbai’s financial sector.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *